QA & Test Automation

QA & Test Automation Services

A test suite is only valuable if the team trusts it. We build suites that are fast, stable and wired into every release.

Discuss your requirement See capabilities

What you get

Test automation frameworks
API & contract testing
Performance & load testing
Manual & exploratory QA

Overview

Why teams bring us in

Flaky tests are worse than no tests: they train engineers to ignore red builds. Exubers builds automation that is deterministic, layered correctly, and fast enough that nobody is tempted to skip it.

We cover the full quality function — exploratory and manual testing where human judgement matters, automated regression at unit, API and UI level, and performance testing that finds the breaking point before your customers do.

Capabilities

Inside our QA & Test Automation

Every engagement is scoped from this set. We do not sell all of it to everyone — we sell the parts that move your constraint.

Test automation frameworks

Playwright, Cypress and Selenium suites with page-object structure, parallel execution and stable selectors.

API & contract testing

REST and GraphQL coverage with contract tests that catch breaking changes before integration environments do.

Performance & load testing

JMeter, k6 and Gatling scenarios modelled on real traffic, with capacity findings tied to infrastructure decisions.

Manual & exploratory QA

Structured exploratory sessions, accessibility checks and release sign-off where automation cannot reach.

Security & accessibility testing

OWASP-aligned checks and WCAG 2.2 AA audits integrated into the release process.

CI quality gates

Test tiers wired into pipelines so the right suite runs at the right stage without slowing every commit.

How we work

A delivery sequence you can plan around

Audit

Coverage, flakiness rate and pipeline duration measured, plus a risk map of what is untested and matters most.

Strategy

A test pyramid appropriate to your architecture, with explicit rules about what belongs at each layer.

Automate

Framework build and suite implementation, prioritising the journeys that generate revenue or carry compliance risk.

Integrate

Suites wired into CI with quality gates, reporting and a flakiness budget that is actively defended.

TrustedFlakiness treated as a defect, with a defended budget

LayeredFast unit and API coverage, minimal brittle UI tests

GatedQuality checks enforced in CI, not by convention

Technology

Tools we use in QA & Test Automation work

Chosen per engagement against your team's existing skills and constraints, never as a default.

Playwright Cypress Selenium Jest PyTest JUnit REST Assured Postman k6 JMeter Gatling Axe

FAQ

QA & Test Automation questions, answered

The questions procurement and engineering ask us most often before an engagement starts.

Ask us something else

Should we automate all our testing?

No. Automate the checks that are repetitive, deterministic and run often — regression, API contracts, critical journeys. Keep humans for exploratory testing, usability and edge cases where judgement matters. Teams that try to automate everything usually end up with a slow suite nobody trusts.

How do you deal with flaky tests?

We treat flakiness as a defect with an owner, not an inconvenience. That means stable selectors, no arbitrary waits, isolated test data, quarantining unstable tests out of the blocking suite, and tracking flake rate as a metric that has a budget.

Which automation framework do you recommend?

Playwright for most new web projects — it is fast, handles modern applications well and has excellent parallelism. Cypress remains a good fit for teams already invested in it. Selenium still makes sense where broad legacy browser coverage is a hard requirement.

Can you test our APIs and performance as well as the UI?

Yes, and we would push you to weight coverage that way. API and contract tests are faster, more stable and cheaper to maintain than UI tests, and they catch most integration defects earlier.

Do you provide manual QA alongside automation?

Yes. Manual and exploratory testing catches the class of problem automation is structurally blind to, particularly around usability and unexpected user behaviour.

Related services